Wednesday, 6 August 2008

Yoga And Meditation Change Gene Response To Stress

�Research from the US suggests that mind body techniques care yoga and meditation that put the body in a land of deep rest known as the
relaxation response, are capable of ever-changing how genes behave in response to stress.




The study is the work of researchers at Benson-Henry Institute for Mind/Body Medicine at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and the Genomics
Center at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) and is published online in the open-access journal PLoS One.




Mind-body practices that create a slackening response take in been used by people across cultures for thousands of age to forestall and treat
disease, wrote the authors in their background to the study.




The relaxation reply is characterized by simplification in o intake, increase in exhalation of nitrous oxide, and lower psychological distress. Many
experts see it as the opposite number to the "flight or fight" stress response that has already been shown by a number of studies to have a distinct pattern
of physiological and cistron expression changes (called "transcriptional profile").




The researchers for this study wanted to test the idea that the relaxation response also produces changes in gene expression.




The researchers recruited three groups of people. In the first group (called the M group) there were 19 long term practitioners who had been
practising various ways of producing the relaxation response every day for a long time (for instance with daily yoga, repeated prayer or speculation
practice).




In the second group were another 19 people wHO they called the "healthy controls" (mathematical group N1), wHO were non daily practitioners, and the third group
was care the tidy controls chemical group, except these 20 people completed 8 weeks of relaxation reaction training (this group was N2).




The researchers assessed transcriptional profiles of the people in all three groups from blood samples.




They establish the expressions of a total of 2,209 genes were significantly different between groups M and N1, and a tot of 1,561 genes were likewise
significantly different between groups N2 and N1.




More significantly, however, was the fact 433 of the genes were common to both sets of comparisons: the same ones were different between M and
N1 and betwixt M and N2, so even short term exercise of the relaxation response appeared to produce changes in these 433 cistron
expressions.




Further analysis using techniques called cistron ontology and gene define enrichment, showed that groups M and N1 (the long term and the short term
practitioners of the repose response) exhibited similar physiologic changes such as in "cell metabolism, oxidative phosphorylation, generation of
reactive atomic number 8 species and response to oxidative stress".




A second phase of the study involving 5 N1 healthy controls, 5 N2 short term practitioners, and 6 M long condition practitioners, was done to validate a
significant number of genes and pathways.




The authors concluded that:




"This study provides the first compelling grounds that the RR [liberalization response] elicits specific gene expression changes in short-term and long
term practitioners."




They wrote that their findings suggest:




"Consistent and constitutive changes in gene expression resulting from RR may relate to long term physiological effects," and that "Our study crataegus laevigata
stimulate new investigations into applying transcriptional profiling for accurately measurement RR and stress related responses in multiple disease
settings."




Dr Herbert Benson, director emeritus of the Benson-Henry Institute and co-senior author of the study said:




"Now we've establish how ever-changing the activeness of the mind throne alter the way basic genetic instruction manual are implemented," said Benson.




Dr Towia Libermann, director of the BIDMC Genomics Center and too co-senior author of the study added that:




"This is the first comprehensive study of how the intellect can affect gene expression, linking what has been looked on as a 'soft' science with the 'hard'
science of genomics."




"It is also important because of its focus on gene expression in healthy individuals, rather than in disease states," explained Libermann.




The authors aforesaid their study showed that the relaxation response changed the expression of genes involved with inflammation, programmed cell
death and the handling of free radicals. Free radicals are normal byproducts of metabolism that the body neutralizes in order to stop harm to cells
and tissues.




Co-lead author of the study Dr Jeffery Dusek erstwhile of the Benson-Henry Institute and now with the Abbott Northwestern Hospital in Minneapolis
said:




"Changes in the activation of these same genes have previously been seen in conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder; but the